AI Answer Readiness Checker
I built this browser-based checker to flag structural problems before publishing. It reviews headings, definitions, summaries, references, and passages that may lose meaning out of context.
It does not test whether a search or AI system will crawl, index, retrieve, or cite the page. Your content stays in your browser.
Now includes a Retrievability Audit (v1) mode for structural checks aligned with the Retrieval Stack.
New here? Read the AI Retrieval Content Checklist for the framework behind what this tool is checking.
Input
Paste your draft, pick a mode, and use the score plus fix queue to prioritize the highest-impact edits first.
Client-side only. No API calls. No server storage.
Analysis setup
Local preferences
Readiness score
Many structural flags
Rubric tuned for: Informational + Blog
Analyzing as: English
Detected topics: —
—
Retrievability dimensions
Fix next
Prioritized actions based on missing score weight.
Analysis workspace
Switch between checks, inspection, and rewrite suggestions without losing your score context.
Checks
Click a row to see details
Text inspector
Suggestions
Templates and checklist prompts to improve the current draft.
TL;DR template
TL;DR: [Topic] is [short definition]. The most important points are [point 1], [point 2], and [point 3].
Key takeaways template
## Key takeaways - [Main takeaway 1] - [Main takeaway 2] - [Main takeaway 3]
FAQ skeleton — use only for recurring questions
## FAQ ### What is [topic]? [Direct definition] ### How does [topic] work? [Short explanation] ### When should you use [topic]? [Context + recommendation]
Definition box template
[Topic] is [plain-language definition]. In practice, it helps with [outcome]. Use it when [scenario].
- Define the term early when readers may not know it.
- Lead with the answer when the reader’s task calls for one.
- Use question headings only for questions readers genuinely ask.
- Split paragraphs when they contain more than one main idea.
- Add sources where factual claims need support.